About Me

My photo
Your one stop daily shop for news! Neurotically fun.

Monday, 16 November 2009

Who wears tight tights?

Have you ever noticed it's impossible to keep everyone happy?
This is true of life and style.
Your hair will never be neat enough for your grandparents, your skirt never long enough for your parents, your friends will dicuss "what the hell was she wearing!?" behind your back and your boyfriend's friends will just make the same statement to your face. You can't win.

Or maybe you can but that involves rising above it, because when you dress for you and you are confident enough to know these people all are thinking these thoughts but you don't mind. That is true self belief. To walk down the street wearing an outfit that you feel happy in. And one you are confident enough in your choice in to defend yourself. Nobody will change their mind about your outfit if you are shrinking beneath the labels while they jest.

If the self belief step is one too far in the distance to keep everyone happy then there is always plan B. Carry 80 denier black tights in your bag. Black tights go with almost anything- FACT! You're out, plans change and now you have to mingle sociably with friends parents- throw on the tights. You are wearing a lengthy top and jeans for a casual shopping trip that turns into dinner and drinks- throw on the tights in place of the jeans. You're friends tights rip and she is devastated- you have back up(this does not obviously save your outfit but it's nice to be nice and this will make this friend appreciate you undeniably!)

Tights have been around for centuries, though originally for men(you know the Robin Hood concept). INFACT- an article recently in a magazine revealed tights made for men again. I believe the starting price is £80 and the model was wearing them under cut offs. I'm not ready to air an opinion on this because never say never...

The black tights I am referring to have an excellent sixties vibe. And a good example of tights changing the entire look of an outfit is Marilyn Monroe in 'Let's make love'-


Marilyn's jumper minus the tights would be erm interesting, to say the least. But with it it looks amazing! This scene inspired my wearing of tights for a long time. But be careful Marilyn's outfit is not acceptable for outdoor use, that jumper is fairly short. So maybe still trial it past your mum before you go out and if she looks disagreeingly at the length of the jumper even with the tights then she may actually be right. Sometimes seeing a celebrity doing something can deem it ok, but bum visible through tights is not a good look.

Sunday, 15 November 2009

Brigitte knows best.

A cheeky bit of backcombing could make the world of difference to the most unattractive person.
Backcombing frames your face, adds height, looks 'sexy' and shows a rebellious side through forcing hair into unnatural positions. Whether for an updo, or a Monday morning backcombing is a brilliant base.

Glamour's December issue features Leighton Meester and I must confess i'm not her biggest fan. But seeing her on the cover backcombed to the max and wrapped in a fur jacket pulled me in like a magnet(that, and the free Nails inc. nailpolish...)

The queen of the backcombed do was Miss Bardot, Brigitte Bardot(whose name appears on a very cute Zara top this season!)
Brigitte mastered the chignon with height that, sad to say, put Audrey's to shame.

Also that sexy, messy bedhair that screams confidence.

Others have represented the trend well. Such as Jackie O, scene kids and ofcourse Britain's biggest girl crush Cheryl would be nothing without that hair(the real and the fake strands...)

Hair really makes an outfit. If an outfit represents a sentence then hair is the punctuation. So go on- add an exclamation mark to tomorrow's ensemble!

Saturday, 14 November 2009

Accessory du jour.

IMPORTANT MESSAGE: Imagination necessary! Photographs could not be used to save anonymity.

A friend once asked me to give a detailed description of my 'type'.
As I typed. And typed and typed... pressing enter felt like my execution.
It felt as though this was a moment in a movie where all of a sudden he'd appear.
Sad as it may seem, I saved this description... and looking back at it revealed 2 things- 80% of the characteristics were based upon the lads style, also revealing that if I am so sure about what I want from a boys style why do I find it so difficult to have a goal with my own!?!

An ex revealed he thinks I like a boy to be my accessory du jour. But this must be a universal thing, looking back to my second post on the 'Gossip Girl' boys- a person who liked one of these guys could not really like another due to category restrictions. A handful of my friends like rugby guys- you know the ones in their grey joggers, with scarily wide shoulders and an 'Edinburgh' looking face. One likes music kids, where the musical influence just shines through on that t-shirt of theirs and another is into a very specific- and I quote "guys whose style is different from that of their group".

Boys are now seen as the classic 'it' item, as far as i'm concerned, and nothing explains a person more than how they accessorise.

Friday, 13 November 2009

Mr Keats, YOU can leave your hat on,

"Would I were steadfast as thou art", then fashion would not exist.

BBC films have charmed me again, though I find them more like drama series than films, 'Bright Star' is most definitely up their with 'An education'. The life of a charming John Keats whom, if he was as moderately handsome as the actor who plays him, has me crushing ever so slightly. That poetry, his untimely end and hats.

Yes hats, I will pass by the obvious discussion point here being the romanticism of John's words inspiring many a design, or even the fact his love interest(gosh knows why the utterly selfish girl. In my opinion) who is obsessed with fashion/making clothes/sewing. And talk about hats.

One scene in particular as Keats, Miss Brawne, Sammy and Toots(yeah apparently you can call a kid toots, it has shook my life plan for sure) are walking with their silhouettes visible and the shape of their hats is of utter amusement.

London 1881, hats were a way of life under Victoria's reign. She herself often spotted wearing delightfully decorated hats much like our leading lady.

"To feel for ever its soft fall and swell," is how hats exist to the world. Going in and out of style as quick as a heartbeat.
Please note, this season is most definitely a swell however and I would advise an array of hats. I have my eye on a nice little quirky number from River Island actually, but girl rule #1- thou shalt not purchase an item with knowledge of a friend maintaining current ownership. Damn you Lorne, however Mum it is coming up to Christmas and rules can be bent-

Thursday, 12 November 2009

A (Stuart)Rose by any other name would smell as sweet...

Brands in fashion are as relevant as sugar in sweets.
Fashion as a whole is about portraying ones identity for the world to see, brands help(quite literally) to spell it out to us.

Certain connotations spring to mind when some brands are mentioned. Chanel for example oozes 'classic sophistication', Laura Ashley is 'prim and proper', and Marks & Spencer... well that just makes you think of 'mum'.

A current Christmas temp. job in Marks and Spencer has lead to re-evaluation, i've never been one to care where things are from considering half my wardrobe is from a charity shop but I must admit I was pasremarkable about Markies, as it's affectionately known by loyal staff and customers...

It really has to be said that although the brand represents the customer, the customer also represents the brand. So wearing that chunky knit your granny would wear with corduroys with this seasons oh so hot knee high boots and tights would change the image given. Vogue even agrees this season.

I'll let the pictures do the talking-



Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Voila Stella!

Walking along, feeling all wintery whilst wearing my earmuffs and eating my cinammon crepe I saw the nicest thing. Stella McCartney doing another collaboration. She does seem to be overly fond of a collaboration or two, but I do enjoy them. What's not to enjoy about the fact at her last collaboration(with Adidas) she had real athletes performing in her designs at the launch- that's innovatively, futuristic fashion!



Anyway this collaboration is a bit different. It's for Gap and it's for children. Now children are most definitely the last thing on my mind but to dress them in this line they are worth considering! It takes childrens clothing to a new level, it gives them style. The outfits are utterly desirable to the point of thinking crazy thoughts such as: "Age 11 could stretch, right!?" or "I wonder if Stella would make one in my size if I asked nicely".

Well think of my extreme wonderment when this line I had saw only briefly in Gap's window as I scurried past with my crepe cropped up in Grazia, where I can view it without feeling like a creep in a kids department. The picture shown is amazing photography as well as an excellent exhibit of the line-


Grazia's title is amusingly accurate also- "Shrink us all now, Stella!" The launch was a Halloween themed kids party in a school, how totally well timed for the fashion world in my opinion. In Grazia Stella points out that these are clothes she'd like to dress her own children in(she has 3!) and because of this she has tried to include alot of practical basics aswell. Practical and stylish! I am really tempted to go out and treat my baby brother to a whole new wardrobe, but then again children's shoe sizes go up to a 4 right?
Maybe i'll just go see if I can squish my size 5's in before I go indulging anyone else. Sorry Jack, that's what pocket money is for.

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Srike a pose!

Magazine day. You know that day when everything is going wrong and then you get home and the door wont open quickly enough because of something dragging on the floor as you push it. And in that instant your day goes from awful to AMAZING with the realisation that that dragging is actually a teleport to an evening spent with models, couture and dreamy settings.

Everybody loves magazine day, but unfortunately for me my magazines get delivered to my home address as opposed to my uni one which is why a trip home this up and coming weekend is necessary! To be a complete tease I thought i'd run a blog on this months covers of my two subscription favourites- Vogue & Elle.

Beginning with Vogue which has been around for over a century, UK edition just under. Vogue is high fashion. With exception to their more dash than cash articles(which still are not much less demanding on finances) Vogue remains the provider of fashion information for it's original target audience- middle to upper class women, socialites. Everyone I have this conversation with seems to think of Vogue as old school and past it(it actually hurts me to type that...) but I love that I am not it's target audience. Vogue is an aspiration not an aid. It doesn't give information that will help you further your career or outfits you can afford, it let's you live the dream. It shows you another world which you can escape to through reading it's stories and becoming lost in it's images and I would hate, DESPISE even, if Vogue changed. This month-


Lara stone in the classic taking over ballgown similar to the Kate Moss 2007 December cover. Alot of alliteration is prevalent. Pastel pink for the title, and cool colour tones throughout. And that dash of hope in the swirly lettering of 'wonderful' which appears for no real reason except to appear. Vogue stay traditional in the fact it's always usually models as opposed to celebrities they use as cover girls with few exceptions. Lara was born in the Netherlands, will celebrate her 27th in December, tripped up at a Karl Lagerfeld show and has been face of Givenchy, Calvin Klein beauty and Jean Paul Gaultier. Lara has been commonly used by Vogue since 2006.

Elle is everything Vogue isn't. It's young, fresh and adapatable to change. If Vogue is your dream man whom it would never work out with for endless reasons Elle is a fling, a fun quickie that you will always remember for it's lack of seriousness. Elle was introduced in the mid 80's which goes a long way to explain what it's all about. Elle is read by a range of people, and although couture and premium price fashion is shown it is often mixed with Topshop or Reiss, and more affordable pieces. Elle gives good insight to behind the scenes information also with a monthly video on their website featuring their making of the front cover and not to mention Olivia Palermo's "job" at American Elle. This month-

Elle does go the celeb on cover route and has had the same colour span for the past few issues. It's Kate Hudson this issue and nothing is noticably different from other months as opposed to Vogue making a larger deal out of their December issue. A key trend is highlighted on the cover in the form of leather though. And notice her different than usual make up and hair. Kate looks the complete opposite of her usual carefree, boho style with a structured, tailored, sophistocated outfit and young, edgy eye make up and hair. Kate's facial expression could be said to be similar to the famed i-D wink! This Elle cover is a visual statement of the points raised about it's fling attitude.

Choosing between Vogue and Elle in my mind is like choosing between food and sleep. Impossible because any normal person needs both to make good all round judgement in life(fashion...)